NASA Mission at Risk: Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore Must Return in 14 Days
The potential overcrowding at the International Space Station (ISS) due to NASA’s Crew-9 mission scheduled for August 18 poses a challenge. Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore, currently stranded on the ISS, must return to Earth to make room for the new crew. Resolving the technical issues with the Boeing Starliner spacecraft is crucial to avoid delaying or canceling the upcoming mission.
NASA plans to prioritize the return of Williams and Wilmore to free up docking ports.
The ISS is designed to house 3-6 astronauts, and additional crew could cause congestion.
NASA officials view the increased traffic as a positive sign of progress.
Technical fixes for the Starliner spacecraft are in progress, with no set return date yet.
Backup options are under review to ensure the safe return of the stranded astronauts.
Main Article
NASA’s International Space Station (ISS) is on the brink of congestion as the space agency prepares for its upcoming Crew-9 mission scheduled for August 18. The mission, set to launch from Earth with four astronauts aboard the SpaceX Crew Dragon, faces a potential delay due to the extended stay of astronauts Sunita Williams and Barry “Butch” Wilmore on the ISS. The duo has been stranded since June 6 due to technical issues with their Boeing Starliner spacecraft, which is currently docked at the ISS.
The situation at the ISS has led to concerns about overcrowding, as the station is designed to accommodate only three to six astronauts at a time. The addition of the Crew-9 mission would push the number of occupants beyond this limit, causing potential logistical challenges and safety concerns.
Technical Issues with the Starliner
The Boeing Starliner spacecraft, which was meant to bring Williams and Wilmore back to Earth, has encountered propulsion system problems. The spacecraft’s return has become a priority to free up one of the two docking ports at the ISS.
The Crew-9 Mission
The Crew-9 mission, part of NASA’s collaboration with SpaceX, is crucial for the rotational shift of astronauts aboard the ISS. Scheduled to launch on August 18, the mission includes a six-month stay for its four astronauts, further emphasizing the need to resolve the Starliner issue promptly.
Potential Solutions and Contingency Plans
NASA and Boeing are working diligently to resolve the technical issues with the Starliner. Mark Nappi, who leads the Starliner efforts at Boeing, expressed hope that the technical fixes would be completed soon. The delay has prompted discussions about potential solutions to manage the increased traffic at the ISS.
Impact on the ISS Operations
The potential overcrowding at the ISS could impact daily operations, including scientific experiments, maintenance, and crew activities. The station’s infrastructure is designed to support a specific number of occupants, and exceeding this limit could strain resources.
Conclusion
NASA’s Crew-9 mission and the extended stay of astronauts Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore on the International Space Station (ISS) highlight how active space exploration is. The ISS sometimes gets crowded. This needs careful planning and quick solutions to technical problems. NASA and the company Boeing are working to bring the Starliner spacecraft back to Earth safely. Their main goal is to make sure all space missions are safe and successful.
Sunita Williams, Barry Wilmore, The CFT mission, which launched on June 5, 2024, was originally expected to last about 10 days. However, the mission was extended beyond 10 days and then again beyond 45 days due to better than expected battery performance. As of August 4, 2024, the mission had lasted 59 days and was still ongoing
Starlink Dish V4 and Router Gen 3: Installation and Setup Guide
The new Starlink Dish V4 and Router Gen 3 offer significantly improved performance, durability, and user-friendliness. With enhanced download and upload speeds, reduced response time, and a straightforward installation process, this hardware is designed to provide high-quality internet service in remote and underserved areas.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
Better download and upload speeds
Reduced latency
Improved durability
User-friendly setup and app
Wide availability
Cons:
Significant up-front cost compared with cable or fiber modems
Performance varies with location and gateway assignment
Dish V4: Newer, more compact, and durable with a larger antenna surface.
Router Gen 3: Enhanced with Wi-Fi 6, tri-band support, and better coverage.
Improved Performance: Faster speeds, better connectivity, and lower latency.
Installation: Easy to set up with a detailed guide and app assistance.
Service Plans: Standard residential plan at $120 per month, with no data cap.
Testing Results: Significant improvements in download, upload speeds, and latency.
Verdict: The best satellite internet hardware with ongoing improvements.
Introduction to Starlink
Starlink is a satellite internet service provided by Elon Musk’s SpaceX. It offers broadband internet almost anywhere with a clear view of the sky, making high-speed internet accessible in remote areas where traditional services like cable or fiber are unavailable. Starlink uses a network of low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites to provide internet connectivity.
The Latest Starlink Gear: Dish V4 and Router Gen 3
The latest Starlink equipment includes the Dish V4 and Router Gen 3. These new devices promise better performance with upgraded specifications and enhanced durability.
Starlink Standard Kit (2024 Model) Specs
Beamforming
IPv6 Compatible
MU-MIMO
Number of Antennas: 12
Table 1: Comparison of Old and New Starlink Dishes
Specification
Dish V2
Dish V4
Antenna Surface Area
Smaller
Larger
Design
Bulkier
Slimmer
Durability
Standard
Enhanced
Wind Resistance
Moderate
Higher
Weight
Heavier
Lighter
Table 2: Router Gen 3 Specifications
Feature
Router Gen 2
Router Gen 3
Wi-Fi Standard
Wi-Fi 5
Wi-Fi 6
Bands
Dual-band
Tri-band
MU-MIMO Support
2×2
4×4
Max Devices Supported
128
235
Coverage Area
2,000 sq. ft.
3,200 sq. ft.
Ethernet Ports
None
2
Installation and Setup
Installing the new Starlink equipment is straightforward. The Starlink kit includes the dish, router, cables, and power supply.
Unbox the Equipment: Ensure all components are present.
Position the Dish: Place the dish in a location with a clear view of the sky. Use the integrated kickstand for stability.
Connect the Cables: Attach the provided cables to the dish and the router.
Power Up: Connect the power supply to an electrical outlet.
Download the Starlink App: Use the app to guide you through the setup process and ensure optimal placement.
Complete Setup: Follow the app’s instructions to finalize the installation and connect your devices.
Starlink’s 2024 Service Plans
Starlink offers several service plans, with the standard residential plan costing $120 per month. This plan includes high-speed internet with no data cap, ideal for streaming, gaming, and video calls.
Other Service Plans
Business Plan: Higher cost and enhanced performance for business needs.
RV Plan: Tailored for use on the go, suitable for RVs and vans.
To evaluate the performance of the new Starlink hardware, a 20-day testing period was conducted, revealing significant improvements in download, upload speeds, and response time.
Download Speeds
Average: 150 Mbps
Peak: 325 Mbps
Low: 47 Mbps
Upload Speeds
Average: 23 Mbps
Peak: 30 Mbps
Low: 10 Mbps
Response Time
Average: 29 ms
Low: 20 ms
High: 50 ms
Conclusion
The Starlink Dish V4 and Router Gen 3 represent the best satellite internet hardware available, offering improved performance, durability, and user-friendliness. With better download and upload speeds, reduced latency, and a straightforward installation process, this hardware is ideal for providing high-quality internet service in remote and underserved areas. Despite the significant up-front cost, the benefits and ongoing improvements make it a worthwhile investment for those in need of reliable internet connectivity.
Safety Concerns: Discussions about the safety of using Starliner versus Crew Dragon.
Potential Impact: Decision may affect the future of the Starliner program.
NASA’s Challenge: Balancing risk and reward in the final decision.
NASA Explores Solutions to Return Boeing Starliner Crew Safely
Eight weeks after the Starliner spacecraft launched, NASA is still looking for possible answers to its technical issues—including the possibility of SpaceX lending a hand.
Yes, there had been some problems on Starliner’s ride to the space station that involved helium leaks and failing thrusters. But officials said they were relatively minor and sought to downplay them. “Those are pretty small, really, issues to deal with,” Mark Nappi, vice president and manager of Boeing’s Commercial Crew Program, said during a post-docking news conference. “We’ll figure them out for the next mission. I don’t see these as significant at all.”
But days turned to weeks, and weeks turned to months as NASA and Boeing continued to study the two technical problems. Of these issues, the more pressing concern was the failure of multiple reaction control system thrusters that are essential to steering Starliner during its departure from the space station and setting up a critical engine burn to enter Earth’s atmosphere.
In the last few weeks, ground teams from NASA and Boeing completed testing of a thruster on a test stand at White Sands, New Mexico. Then, last weekend, Boeing and NASA fired the spacecraft’s thrusters in orbit to check their performance while docked at the space station. NASA has said preliminary results from these tests were helpful.
Dragon Becomes a Real Option
One week ago, the last time NASA officials spoke to the media, the agency’s program manager for commercial crew, Steve Stich, would not be drawn into discussing what would happen should NASA conclude that Starliner’s thrusters were not reliable enough for the return journey to Earth.
For a long time, it seemed almost certain that the astronauts would return to Earth inside Starliner.
However, there has been a lot of recent activity at NASA, Boeing, and SpaceX that suggests that Wilmore and Williams could come home aboard a Crew Dragon spacecraft rather than Starliner. Due to the critical importance of this mission, Ars is sharing what we know as of Thursday afternoon.
One informed source said it was greater than a 50-50 chance that the crew would come back on Dragon. Another source said it was significantly more likely than not they would. To be clear, NASA has not made a final decision. This probably will not happen until at least next week. It is likely that Jim Free, NASA’s associate administrator, will make the call.
Asked if it was now more likely than not that Starliner’s crew would return on Dragon, NASA spokesperson Josh Finch told Ars on Thursday evening,
“NASA is evaluating all options for the return of agency astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams from the International Space Station as safely as possible. No decisions have been made, and the agency will continue to provide updates on its planning.”
What follows are some data points that Ars can confidently report based on multiple sources:
NASA keeps delaying a decision: A Flight Readiness Review meeting had been scheduled for today, August 1, several days in advance. However, it was canceled. Instead, NASA put out a vague blog update on Thursday stating, “Following the completion of Starliner’s return planning, which is expected to continue into next week, more information will be shared about the agency’s return readiness review preparations and subsequent media briefing.” So maybe the meeting will take place next week.
SpaceX has been actively working on a scenario in which two or four astronauts launch on board Crew 9: (A normal crew is four) This mission has a nominal launch date of August 18, but it could well be delayed. SpaceX has already identified flight suits that would fit Wilmore and Williams, allowing them to fly home on the Crew-8 spacecraft (presently docked to the space station) or the Crew-9 vehicle. It is unclear how crews would be assigned to the two Dragon return flights. It is possible, if four astronauts launch on Crew 9, that five people could fly home on each of the two Dragons.
Two sources told Ars that in meetings this week at NASA field centers, there have been vigorous discussions about whether or not to fly crew home on Starliner: Multiple groups remain “no” on Starliner as of Wednesday. It is unclear how this will be resolved. Some engineers believe that if there are questions about Starliner, then NASA should opt for the safe course—flying on Crew Dragon, which has safely launched 13 times and landed 12 times.
Making Difficult Calls
NASA officials face a difficult decision. Because there is still at least a small risk to flying Starliner in its present condition, the space agency and Boeing have tested the thrusters as thoroughly as possible while the spacecraft is docked to the space station. This testing was intended to “buy down” these risks. But while the data is good, it has not addressed all of NASA’s concerns.
But the alternative—Starliner not coming home safely with the crew inside—is far, far worse. This is the risk-reward decision that Free, Stich, and other NASA officials ultimately must balance in the coming days.
A combination where some crew return on Crew-8 and others on Crew-9.
Under consideration
Conclusion
NASA faces a challenging decision in determining the safest way to return the Starliner crew. With ongoing concerns about Starliner’s thrusters, the reliable alternative of SpaceX’s Crew Dragon is being seriously considered. The ultimate choice will have significant implications for both NASA and Boeing, balancing safety, risk, and the future of the Starliner program.
SpaceX Launches Two Starlink Missions in Quick Succession: Back-to-Back Success
SpaceX successfully launched two Falcon 9 rockets within five hours, deploying Starlink satellites from both coasts. The launches marked a swift recovery from a previous failure on July 11. Both missions achieved full success, with all satellites deployed into low Earth orbit. The rapid succession of launches demonstrated SpaceX’s operational efficiency and resilience.
Summary
Two Falcon 9 launches occurred on July 28, 2024, less than five hours apart.
First launch: 1:09 a.m. EDT from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Florida, carrying 23 Starlink satellites.
Second launch: 5:22 a.m. EDT from Vandenberg Space Force Base, California, carrying 21 Starlink satellites.
Both missions were successful: rockets’ first stages landed on ships at sea, and satellites were deployed as planned.
July 27 launch: marked the return-to-flight mission after a July 11 failure.
July 11 failure: due to a liquid oxygen leak in the upper stage, caused by a cracked pressure sensor line.
Corrective measures: SpaceX removed the faulty sensor and implemented alternatives to prevent recurrence.
Operational milestone: 14th mission for the Falcon 9 first stage and the 300th reflight of a SpaceX booster.
The first part of a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket stands on a ship’s deck. It just launched 21 Starlink satellites from California on July 28, 2024. (Image credit: SpaceX)
Main Article
SpaceX has demonstrated remarkable resilience and operational efficiency by launching two Starlink missions within five hours on July 28, 2024. This back-to-back success marked a significant recovery after a launch failure earlier in the month.
The Launches
The first launch occurred at 1:09 a.m. EDT from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida. A Falcon 9 rocket, topped with 23 Starlink satellites, lifted off smoothly. This mission was the 14th for this Falcon 9 first stage, highlighting SpaceX’s commitment to reusability and cost-effectiveness. The company celebrated the 300th reflight of a SpaceX booster with this mission, showcasing their advancement in rocket technology.
Less than five hours later, at 5:22 a.m. EDT, another Falcon 9 rocket launched from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. This mission carried 21 Starlink satellites, 13 of which have the capability to beam service directly to cell phones, broadening the scope of SpaceX’s satellite internet service.
Both missions were executed flawlessly. The first stages of the rockets landed precisely on drone ships stationed at sea, and the upper stages deployed the satellites into their intended low Earth orbits.
Swift Recovery from July 11 Failure
This operational success came after a setback on July 11, when a Falcon 9 launch failed due to a liquid oxygen leak in the upper stage. The leak was traced to a crack in a pressure sensor line, preventing the rocket from performing an orbit-raising burn. Consequently, the 20 Starlink satellites onboard were deployed into lower orbits than planned.
SpaceX’s quick investigation and corrective measures ensured that the problem would not recur. According to a company update on July 25, the faulty sensor and sense line were removed from the second-stage engine for near-term launches. Alternate sensors already present on the engine were used to cover the removed sensor’s functions, ensuring flight safety and reliability.
The success of these missions has several implications for SpaceX and the broader aerospace industry:
Increased Confidence in Reusability: The repeated use of Falcon 9 first stages underscores the viability of reusable rocket technology, paving the way for more cost-effective space missions.
Enhanced Satellite Internet Coverage: The deployment of Starlink satellites with direct-to-cell capability can significantly improve global internet connectivity, particularly in remote and underserved areas.
Operational Efficiency: The ability to conduct multiple launches in quick succession showcases SpaceX’s operational maturity, setting a high standard for launch cadence and reliability.
Technical Specifications
Component
Specification
Falcon 9 Rocket
Two-stage reusable rocket
Payload
Starlink satellites
First Stage
14th mission (1st launch), reusable
Second Stage
Equipped with alternate sensors
Landing Site
Drone ships at sea
Launch Sites
Cape Canaveral, Vandenberg Space Force Base
Conclusion
SpaceX’s successful launch of two Falcon 9 rockets within five hours on July 28, 2024, represents a significant achievement in space exploration and satellite deployment. This back-to-back success not only showcases the company’s technical prowess and resilience but also reinforces the potential of reusable rocket technology in making space more accessible and cost-effective. The rapid recovery from the July 11 failure and the flawless execution of these missions highlight SpaceX’s commitment to innovation and excellence in the aerospace industry.
SpaceX Falcon 9 Rocket Launches Return Following FAA Green Light
SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets have resumed launches after a temporary pause due to a failure on July 11. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) cleared SpaceX to return to flight operations on July 25, following corrective measures for the anomaly. The successful relaunch on July 26 marks a significant step forward, allowing SpaceX to continue its space missions with an improved focus on safety and reliability. Upcoming missions include both crewed and uncrewed flights, with high-profile projects like the Polaris Dawn mission and the Crew-9 mission scheduled in the near future.
Summary
FAA Green Light: SpaceX received approval from the FAA to resume Falcon 9 launches.
July 11 Failure: The anomaly was caused by a crack in a pressure sensor line, leading to an oxygen leak.
SpaceX’s Response: The company has removed the faulty sensor lines and implemented corrective actions.
Successful Launch: On July 26, SpaceX launched a Falcon 9 rocket carrying Starlink satellites.
Upcoming Missions: Includes Polaris Dawn, a private spacewalk mission, and the Crew-9 mission to the ISS.
Starship Tests: SpaceX is preparing for the fifth test flight of its Starship/Super Heavy system.
FAA Oversight: The FAA will continue to monitor SpaceX’s activities to ensure safety.
Introduction
SpaceX, the aerospace company founded by Elon Musk, has made headlines once again with the resumption of its Falcon 9 rocket launches. After a failed mission on July 11, which led to a temporary halt in operations, the company received a crucial green light from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on July 25. This approval was a significant step in getting SpaceX back on track with its ambitious space exploration plans.
The July 11 Failure
On July 11, 2024, a Falcon 9 rocket experienced a significant failure that halted SpaceX’s flight schedule. The issue was traced to a crack in a pressure sensor line for the upper stage’s liquid-oxygen system. This crack caused an oxygen leak, which in turn led to degraded performance of the upper-stage engine. The failure resulted in the loss of 20 Starlink satellites that were intended to enhance SpaceX’s high-speed internet network.
The problem was identified as a fatigue crack in the sense line, which is crucial for monitoring the pressure of the liquid-oxygen system. According to SpaceX, the crack was caused by high loading from engine vibrations and a looseness in the clamp that normally holds the line in place. This malfunction led to excessive cooling of engine components during a planned coast phase, resulting in a hard start upon engine restart and damage to the hardware.
SpaceX took immediate action to address the issue. The company worked under FAA oversight to pinpoint the root cause and develop a corrective strategy. They removed the faulty sense lines and sensors from the upper stages of upcoming Falcon 9 rockets. As a result, the company could clear the way for the resumption of flights.
“The sensor is not used by the flight safety system and can be covered by alternate sensors already present on the engine,” SpaceX explained in a statement.
Resumption of Launches
Following the FAA’s green light, SpaceX quickly got back to its flight schedule. On July 26, 2024, the company successfully launched a Falcon 9 rocket from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The launch was notable for several reasons:
Timing: The rocket lifted off at 1:45 a.m. ET (05:45 GMT), demonstrating SpaceX’s ability to resume operations with minimal delay.
Mission Objective: Like the failed July 11 mission, this launch also carried a batch of SpaceX’s Starlink satellitesto low Earth orbit.
Launch Success: The launch appeared to proceed without incident. The first-stage booster successfully landed on a drone ship in the Atlantic Ocean, while the second stage deployed 23 Starlink satellites into orbit.
The FAA’s evaluation of the July 11 failure concluded that there were no public safety issues involved. The agency’s determination allowed Falcon 9 rockets to return to flight operations while the overall investigation into the anomaly remained open. This decision reflects the FAA’s confidence in SpaceX’s ability to manage safety and address issues promptly.
Upcoming Missions and Future Prospects
SpaceX has several high-profile missions lined up, which include both crewed and uncrewed flights. These missions are critical for the company’s continued success and its role in advancing space exploration.
One of the upcoming missions is the Polaris Dawn mission, which is privately funded and led by billionaire entrepreneurJared Isaacman. Scheduled for late summer, the Polaris Dawn mission will feature the first private-sector spacewalk. Isaacman has indicated that while there will be some additional training before launch, he remains confident in SpaceX’s capabilities:
“There are training currency requirements. We will likely have a few days of sim and EVA refreshers before launch. Most importantly, we have complete confidence in SpaceX and they have managed the 2nd stage anomaly and resolution. We will launch when ready and it won’t be long,” Isaacman said in a recent update.
Booster Landing: Unlike previous missions where the booster splashed down in the Gulf of Mexico, the new plan involves having the booster land back at Starbase using two giant arms known as “chopsticks.”
FAA Licensing: This change in the flight profile may require a re-evaluation of SpaceX’s FAA license for Starship test flights.
Conclusion
SpaceX’s ability to resume Falcon 9 launches following the FAA’s green light is a testament to the company’s resilience and commitment to safety. The successful launch on July 26 and the planned upcoming missions reflect SpaceX’s ongoing efforts to advance space exploration and commercial spaceflight. With continued oversight from the FAA and rigorous testing of new technologies, SpaceX is poised to maintain its position as a leading player in the aerospace industry.
SpaceX to Launch NOAA’s Advanced Climate Satellite with $113 Million Contract
SpaceX has been awarded a $112.7 million contract to launch NOAA’s JPSS-4 satellite. The JPSS-4 is part of the Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) program, a cooperative effort between NOAA and NASA. The satellite will be launched atop a Falcon 9 rocket from Vandenberg Space Force Base in 2027. The JPSS program aims to collect critical data on Earth’s land, sea, and air to support weather prediction, climate monitoring, and disaster response. Three JPSS satellites have already been launched and remain operational, contributing to decades of Earth science research. The Falcon 9 has experienced a recent failure, but SpaceX continues to be a key player in space missions. The JPSS fleet will eventually consist of five satellites, with JPSS-3 scheduled to launch in 2032.
Three operational JPSS satellites: Suomi NPP, JPSS-1, and JPSS-2.
Falcon 9 has launched 69 times in 2024 but recently suffered a failure.
JPSS-3 scheduled for 2032, completing the five-satellite fleet.
SpaceX’s Falcon 9 grounded temporarily due to recent mission failure.
JPSS program enhances Earth science research and benefits humanity.
SpaceX to Launch NOAA’s Advanced Climate Satellite with $113 Million Contract
SpaceX, the private spaceflight company founded by Elon Musk, continues to expand its portfolio of significant space missions. In 2027, the company will launch the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) JPSS-4 satellite from California’s Vandenberg Space Force Base. This mission, secured with a firm, fixed-price contract worth $112.7 million, marks another milestone in SpaceX’s busy launch schedule.
Overview of the JPSS Program
The Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) is a collaborative effort between NOAA and NASA. This constellation of satellites plays a crucial role in collecting comprehensive data on Earth’s land, sea, and air. Such data are pivotal for continuous observation of Earth’s environment, aiding in understanding and predicting changes in weather, climate, oceans, and coasts. This information supports the nation’s economy, protects lives and property, and advances Earth science research.
NASA officials stated, “These data support NOAA’s mission for continuous observation of Earth’s environment to understand and predict changes in weather, climate, oceans, and coasts to support the nation’s economy and protect lives and property. NASA uses the instruments aboard the JPSS satellites to continue decades of Earth science research for the betterment of humanity.
JPSS Satellites: A Legacy of Environmental Monitoring
These satellites have established a robust legacy of environmental monitoring, and the JPSS fleet will eventually comprise five satellites. The next in line, JPSS-3, is scheduled for launch in 2032.
Importance of the JPSS-4 Mission
TheJPSS-4 satellite is expected to further enhance NOAA’s capability to monitor and predict environmental changes. By providing detailed observations of atmospheric, oceanic, and terrestrial conditions, JPSS-4 will contribute to more accurate weather forecasting, climate monitoring, and disaster response efforts. This information is vital for various sectors, including agriculture, aviation, and emergency management.
SpaceX’s Role and the Falcon 9 Rocket
SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket will be the launch vehicle for the JPSS-4 mission. Known for its reliability and reusability, the Falcon 9 has become a cornerstone of SpaceX’s operations. In 2024 alone, the Falcon 9 has launched 69 times, showcasing its capability to handle a high volume of missions.
However, the rocket recently experienced a setback. On July 11, 2024, the Falcon 9’s upper stage developed a leak of liquid oxygen during a mission, preventing it from completing an orbit-raising engine burn as planned. As a result, the rocket deployed its payloads—20 Starlink internet satellites—too low, leading to their presumed demise in Earth’s atmosphere. Despite this incident, SpaceX’s track record remains strong, and the company is expected to resolve the issue promptly.
Financial and Technical Aspects
The $112.7 million contract awarded to SpaceX includes not only the launch services but also other mission-related costs. This investment underscores the importance of the JPSS-4 mission and highlights SpaceX’s capability to deliver complex and critical space missions.
The JPSS program builds on decades of Earth science research. The data collected by these satellites help scientists understand long-term climate trends and provide critical information for disaster preparedness and response. With the addition of JPSS-4 and the eventual launch of JPSS-3 in 2032, the JPSS fleet will continue to be a cornerstone of environmental monitoring and research.
Impact on Earth Science and Humanity
The JPSS satellites, including the upcoming JPSS-4, are equipped with advanced instruments that provide detailed observations of various environmental parameters. These observations are crucial for numerous applications:
Weather Prediction: Accurate weather forecasts are essential for agriculture, transportation, and emergency management. The data from JPSS satellites help meteorologists make precise predictions, improving public safety and economic stability.
Disaster Response: Real-time data from JPSS satellites support disaster response efforts by providing critical information on storms, wildfires, floods, and other natural disasters. This information helps authorities make informed decisions, potentially saving lives and reducing property damage.
SpaceX is important in the commercial space sector. The company is busy with many launches. These include missions with astronauts and commercial satellite deployments. They also do interplanetary exploration missions. The Falcon 9 rocket has a part called the reusable first stage. This part of the rocket can be used again. This feature has changed space travel by making launches cheaper and more frequent.
Despite the recent setback with the Falcon 9, SpaceX’s innovative approach to spaceflight ensures that such challenges are addressed swiftly. The company’s commitment to continuous improvement and its track record of successful missions position it as a leader in the aerospace industry.
The JPSS program is set to continue its mission of providing critical environmental data well into the future. With JPSS-3 and JPSS-4 scheduled for launch, the program will enhance its observational capabilities, contributing to a better understanding of Earth’s complex environmental systems.
By using advanced technology and working together, missions like JPSS-4 help us understand our planet better. This understanding will benefit humanity.
New SpaceX Dragon Capsule Designed to De-Orbit the ISS
Key Takeaway
SpaceX has been selected to develop a special Dragon spacecraft to de-orbit the ISSby January 2031. The U.S. Deorbit Vehicle will have significantly enhanced capabilities compared to the current Dragon spacecraft. NASA held a live press conference detailing the de-orbit process and showcasing the modified spacecraft. The vehicle will be equipped with more powerful engines and additional solar arrays. The ISS de-orbit mission is a collaboration among multiple international space agencies. The remains of the ISS and the spacecraft will land in the “spacecraft cemetery” in the South Pacific. SpaceX is also involved in other significant NASA missions, including the Artemis program and the Lunar Gateway project.
Summary
SpaceX’s U.S. Deorbit Vehicle: Specially designed to de-orbit the ISS.
Press Conference: NASA revealed details and an image of the modified Dragon spacecraft.
Enhanced Capabilities: The vehicle will have six times the propellant and four times the power of the current Dragon.
Service Module: Larger with additional solar arrays and more Draco engines.
Engine Power: Expected to have 72 Draco thrusters generating close to 30,000 Newtons of thrust.
Join us at 2pm ET, Wednesday, July 17, when NASA and @SpaceX leaders will talk about SpaceX being chosen to develop and deliver the deorbit vehicle that will safely move the @Space_Station out of orbit at the end of its operational life: https://t.co/pTOzYCxMe3pic.twitter.com/QavokuFauN
The New SpaceX Dragon Capsule Designed to De-Orbit the ISS
The International Space Station (ISS) has been a remarkable symbol of international collaboration and scientific advancement for over 25 years. Since its launch, it has hosted over 270 astronauts, cosmonauts, and commercial astronauts from various space agencies around the world. As the ISS approaches the end of its operational life, plans for its safe deorbit and disposal have been set in motion. In January 2031, a specially designed spacecraft by SpaceX, known as the U.S. Deorbit Vehicle, will undertake the critical task of de-orbiting the ISS. On July 17th, NASA held a live press conference to unveil the details of this mission, including a first look at the modified SpaceX Dragon capsule responsible for the deorbit process.
Unveiling the U.S. Deorbit Vehicle
During the press conference, NASA revealed several key features of the U.S. Deorbit Vehicle. SpaceX shared details and an image of the special Dragon via their official X account (formerly Twitter). According to SpaceX, the modified spacecraft will have six times the propellant and four times the power of today’s Dragon spacecraft. The image released shows a robust service module replacing the trunk used by the standard Crew Dragon vehicle. This new service module is larger and equipped with additional fold-out solar arrays, as well as hull-mounted solar panels, to provide the necessary power for the mission.
The modified Dragon capsule also appears to have more Draco engines than the standard Crew Dragon vehicle. The standard Crew Dragon is equipped with 18 Draco engines, each capable of generating 400 Newtons (90 lbf) of thrust, totaling 7,200 N (360 lbf) of thrust. The U.S. Deorbit Vehicle is expected to have 72 Draco thrusters arranged concentrically, capable of generating close to 30,000 Newtons (1,440 lbf) of thrust. This significant increase in thrust power is crucial for the controlled deorbit of the massive ISS structure. The image also shows the spacecraft docking with the Kibo module operated by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA).
Contract and Development
NASA announced the selection of SpaceX in late June to develop the U.S. Deorbit Vehicle as part of a single-award contract valued at up to $843 million. While SpaceX is responsible for the development of the spacecraft, NASA will take ownership once it is complete and operate it throughout the mission. The spacecraft, along with the ISS, is expected to break up during re-entry, with the remains landing in the “spacecraft cemetery” in the South Pacific. The contract for the launch services has not yet been awarded but is expected to be announced shortly.
Since its launch in 1998, the ISS has served as a unique platform for scientific research and technological demonstrations that are not possible on Earth. The ISS is a collaborative effort involving five space agencies: NASA, the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), the European Space Agency (ESA), JAXA, and the Russian State Space Corporation (Roscosmos). Throughout its operational lifetime, the ISS has hosted a wide range of experiments, including studies on the effects of microgravity and space radiation on human, animal, and plant physiology. This research is crucial as NASA and its international partners plan for long-duration missions to the Moon and Mars in the coming decades.
A Symbol of International Cooperation
Beyond its scientific contributions, the ISS stands as a symbol of international cooperation and peaceful use of outer space, in line with theOuter Space Treaty and its core philosophy that “space is for all.” NASA, CSA, ESA, and JAXA have all committed to operating the ISS through 2030, while Roscosmos has committed to continue operations until at least 2028. The safe deorbit of the ISS is a shared responsibility among all five space agencies, ensuring a controlled re-entry and disposal process.
Enhanced Capabilities of the U.S. Deorbit Vehicle
The U.S. Deorbit Vehicle is a big improvement over the current Dragon spacecraft. It has six times more fuel and four times more power. This modified spacecraft can de-orbit the ISS. De-orbiting means guiding the space station back into the Earth’s atmosphere.
The vehicle has a strong service module. A service module is the part of the spacecraft that holds the main systems, like power and propulsion. It also has more solar panels to collect energy from the sun. Additionally, it comes with more Draco engines. Draco engines help the spacecraft move in space. All these upgrades are important. They help the spacecraft do its job well.
The service module is particularly noteworthy. Unlike the standard Crew Dragon vehicle, which uses a trunk for storage and supports various mission operations, the U.S. Deorbit Vehicle’s service module is larger and more powerful. The additional fold-out solar arrays and hull-mounted solar panels ensure that the spacecraft has the necessary power to sustain its systems and perform the de-orbit burn.
The International Space Station (ISS) is in orbit around Earth. Credit: NASA
Draco Engines: Powering the Mission
The increased number of Draco engines is another significant modification. The standard Crew Dragon’s 18 Draco engines generate a total thrust of 7,200 Newtons (360 lbf). In contrast, the U.S. Deorbit Vehicle will feature 72 Draco thrusters, arranged concentrically, capable of generating close to 30,000 Newtons (1,440 lbf) of thrust. This substantial increase in thrust is essential for maneuvering the massive ISS and ensuring a controlled deorbit.
To put this into perspective, the standard Crew Dragon’s Draco engines are designed for precise maneuvering and controlling the spacecraft’s orientation. However, the U.S. Deorbit Vehicle’s mission requires more power to lower the ISS’s orbit and ensure it re-enters Earth’s atmosphere at the correct trajectory. The additional engines and increased thrust capacity will provide the necessary control and power for this critical operation.
Docking with the Kibo Module
The image released by SpaceX shows the U.S. Deorbit Vehicle docking with the Kibo module, a Japanese experiment module operated by JAXA. The Kibo module is one of the largest and most versatile modules on the ISS, featuring an external platform for experiments exposed to the space environment, a logistics module for storage, and an airlock for deploying satellites and other payloads. The U.S. Deorbit Vehicle’s docking with the Kibo module underscores the collaborative nature of the ISS program, involving multiple international partners.
Financial and Operational Aspects
The $843 million contract awarded to SpaceX underscores the significant financial investment in the safe deorbit of the ISS. While SpaceX is responsible for developing the U.S. Deorbit Vehicle, NASA will own and operate the spacecraft once it is completed. This arrangement highlights the collaborative effort between NASA and SpaceX, combining SpaceX’s innovative spacecraft development capabilities with NASA’s operational expertise.
SpaceX’s Role in Future Space Missions
In addition to the U.S. Deorbit Vehicle, SpaceX’s involvement in the Artemis program and the Lunar Gateway project demonstrates the company’s integral role in future space missions. The Starship HLS, developed by SpaceX, will transport astronauts to the lunar surface as part of NASA’s Artemis missions. The Artemis III and IV missions are crucial steps toward establishing a sustainable human presence on the Moon and preparing for future missions to Mars.
SpaceX’s contract to launch the core elements of the Lunar Gateway—the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) and the Habitation and Logistics Outpost (HALO)—further cements the company’s role in NASA’s lunar exploration plans. The Lunar Gateway will serve as a space station in lunar orbit, providing support for long-term human exploration of the Moon and beyond. The Falcon Heavy rocket, which will launch the PPE and HALO into lunar orbit, is one of SpaceX’s most powerful launch vehicles, capable of carrying heavy payloads to deep space destinations.
The Scientific Legacy of the ISS
The ISS has been a cornerstone of scientific research in space for over two decades. It has enabled countless experiments and technology demonstrations that have advanced our understanding of space science, biology, physical sciences, and technology development. Some notable areas of research include the effects of microgravity on human health, plant growth in space, and the development of new materials and technologies that can withstand the harsh conditions of space.
For example, studies on the ISS have provided valuable insights into how microgravity affects muscle and bone density, cardiovascular health, and immune system function. These findings are critical for preparing astronauts for long-duration missions to the Moon and Mars, where they will be exposed to the space environment for extended periods.
In addition to biological and physiological research, the ISS has also hosted experiments in fundamental physics, materials science, and Earth observation. These experiments take advantage of the unique conditions of space to explore phenomena that cannot be studied on Earth. The knowledge gained from these experiments has applications beyond space exploration, contributing to advancements in medicine, materials science, and environmental monitoring.
A Symbol of Peaceful Cooperation
The ISS is not only a scientific laboratory but also a symbol of peaceful cooperation among nations. The collaboration between NASA, CSA, ESA, JAXA, and Roscosmos demonstrates how countries can work together to achieve common goals in space exploration. This spirit of cooperation is enshrined in the Outer Space Treaty, which promotes the peaceful use of outer space and the principle that space is the province of all humankind.
The commitment of these space agencies to operate the ISS through 2030, and Roscosmos’ commitment through 2028, reflects their dedication to maintaining this symbol of international partnership. The safe deorbit of the ISS is a shared responsibility, ensuring that the legacy of cooperation continues even as the station’s operational life comes to an end.
The Future of Space Exploration
The deorbit of the ISS marks the end of an era, but it also paves the way for the next generation of space exploration. NASA and its international partners are already looking toward the future, with plans for the Lunar Gateway, Artemis missions, and eventual human missions to Mars. The knowledge and experience gained from operating the ISS will be invaluable as humanity takes its next steps into the cosmos.
Conclusion
The development of the U.S. Deorbit Vehicle by SpaceX marks a significant milestone in the safe deorbit and disposal of the ISS. With enhanced capabilities and a robust design, the modified Dragon spacecraft will ensure a controlled re-entry and minimize risks associated with the deorbit process. The ISS has been a cornerstone of scientific research and international cooperation for over 25 years, and its safe deorbit is a shared responsibility among NASA, CSA, ESA, JAXA, and Roscosmos.
As we look to the future, the lessons learned from the ISS will guide us in our exploration of the Moon, Mars, and beyond. The spirit of cooperation and discovery that the ISS embodies will continue to inspire future generations of scientists, engineers, and explorers.
Tables
Table 1: Key Features of the U.S. Deorbit Vehicle
Feature
Details
Propellant
Six times the amount of the current Dragon
Power
Four times the power of the current Dragon
Service Module
Larger, with additional fold-out solar arrays
Draco Engines
72 thrusters, generating close to 30,000 Newtons of thrust
SpaceX Launch from Vandenberg: Falcon 9 Rocket Faces Engine Issues During Satellite Launch
Key Takeaways
SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket experienced an upper stage engine failure during a satellite launch from Vandenberg Space Force Base. The failure occurred during the launch of Starlink satellites, resulting in their deployment into a lower-than-intended orbit. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk statedthat the cause of the failure is under investigation. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is involved in the investigation to enhance public safety and determine the root cause. Upcoming human spaceflight missions are likely to be delayed due to this incident. The Falcon 9 rocket has a history of reliability but has faced issues in the past, including explosions in 2015 and 2016. The first stage of the rocket landed successfully on a ship at sea after separation from the second stage.
Summary
Incident: Falcon 9 upper stage engine failure during launch.
On July 12, 2024, SpaceX faced a significant setback when its Falcon 9 rocket experienced an upper stage engine failure during a satellite launch from Vandenberg Space Force Base. This incident, which occurred during the deployment of Starlink satellites, has prompted an investigation by both SpaceX and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The outcome of this investigation is expected to delay upcoming human spaceflight missions. This article delves into the details of the incident, its implications, and the history of the Falcon 9 rocket.
The Incident
Late Thursday, SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket lifted off from Vandenberg Space Force Base, carrying a batch of Starlink satellites designed to provide internet services to ground stations and cellphones. Shortly after liftoff, the upper stage engine failed during its second burn, preventing the satellites from reaching their intended orbit. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk announced on X (formerly Twitter) that the engine failed for reasons that are currently unknown, and the team is reviewing data to understand the root cause.
Upper stage restart to raise perigee resulted in an engine RUD for reasons currently unknown. Team is reviewing data tonight to understand root cause.
Starlink satellites were deployed, but the perigee may be too low for them to raise orbit. Will know more in a few hours.
The FAA released a statement emphasizing the importance of public safety and outlining its role in the investigation. The agency stated that the investigation is designed to further enhance public safety, determine the root cause of the event, and identify corrective actions to prevent future occurrences. The FAA will be involved in every step of the investigation process and must approve SpaceX’s final report, including any corrective actions.
Impact on Future Missions
NASA relies heavily on SpaceX and its Falcon 9 rockets for transporting both people and cargo to the International Space Station (ISS). The recent engine failure is expected to delay several upcoming missions, including a private citizen mission funded by billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman scheduled for July 31, and a NASA mission in mid-August to send three astronauts and a Russian cosmonaut to the ISS for a six-month stay. These delays are necessary to ensure that the issues are fully understood and rectified before proceeding with human spaceflight missions.
Falcon 9 Rocket: A History of Reliability and Challenges
The Falcon 9 rocket has been a cornerstone of SpaceX’s success, known for its reliability and reusability. In 2023 alone, SpaceX launched the Falcon 9 nearly 100 times, revolutionizing the industry with its frequent and cost-effective launches. The rocket’s first stage is designed to return to Earth and land either on a coastal pad or a ship at sea, making it reusable and significantly reducing launch costs.
However, the Falcon 9 has not been without its challenges. In 2015, a Falcon 9 rocket exploded while carrying cargo to the ISS. The following year, another Falcon 9 exploded on its launchpad during an engine test. Both incidents resulted in thorough investigations and corrective actions, with the FAA ultimately clearing the rocket for continued flights. Despite these setbacks, the Falcon 9 has maintained a strong track record of successful launches.
Current Status of the Starlink Satellites
As of now, it is unclear whether the Starlink satellites launched on Thursday will remain in orbit or re-enter the atmosphere. Elon Musk mentioned that the satellites‘ thrusters need to raise their orbits faster than atmospheric drag can pull them down to prevent them from burning up. The rocket’s first stage, however, performed as expected and successfully landed on a ship at sea after separating from the second stage.
The recent engine failure of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket during a satellite launch from Vandenberg Space Force Base highlights the challenges and complexities of space exploration. While SpaceX has made significant strides in advancing space technology and launching missions, this incident serves as a reminder of the importance of rigorous testing, investigation, and corrective actions. The involvement of the FAA ensures that public safety remains a top priority, and the delay of upcoming human spaceflight missions, while disappointing, is a necessary step to ensure the safety and success of future missions.
Turkey Enters Space Race with First Home-Grown Communication Satellite
Key Takeaway
Turkey successfully launched its first domestically-produced communication satellite, Turksat 6A, marking a significant milestone in the country’s space efforts. The launch, facilitated by a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Cape Canaveral, Florida, expands Turkey’s satellite coverage and advances its television broadcasting capabilities. This achievement underscores Turkey’s growing prowess in satellite production, highlighting the nation’s commitment to becoming a significant player in the global space industry.
Summary
Turkey launched its first domestically-produced communication satellite, Turksat 6A, into orbit.
The satellite was carried into space by a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Cape Canaveral, Florida.
Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan hailed the launch as a “new phase” for Turkey in satellite production.
Over 81% of the subsystems, satellite ground stations, and software for Turksat 6A were produced domestically.
The first signal from Turksat 6A was received 67 minutes after its launch.
Turksat 6A will widen Turkey’s satellite coverage to 5 billion people, enhancing communication and broadcasting capabilities.
The satellite will enable Turkey to reach new regions, including India, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand.
The launch is the result of a 10-year effort to domestically produce a satellite, positioning Turkey among 11 countries with such capabilities.
Turksat 6A signifies a major step forward in Turkey’s space ambitions and technological advancements.
Introduction
Turkey has made a big move in its space exploration by launching its first home-built communication satellite called Turksat 6A. This is a very important event for Turkey. It shows that Turkey can now compete in the space race. It also demonstrates Turkey’s skills in making and using satellite technology. The satellite was launched from Cape Canaveral, Florida. It went up on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket. Turksat 6A will change the way Turkey handles communication and broadcasting.
Historical Context
Turkey’s journey into space has been progressive, with previous satellite launches relying on foreign assistance. The launch of Turksat 6A, however, marks a departure from this dependency, emphasizing Turkey’s commitment to self-reliance and technological advancement. This achievement is the culmination of a decade-long effort, reflecting the nation’s strategic vision and investment in space technology.
Technical Specifications and Development
Turksat 6A stands as a testament to Turkish ingenuity and expertise. Over 81% of the satellite’s subsystems, ground stations, and software were produced domestically, showcasing the country’s technological capabilities. The satellite’s development involved extensive collaboration among Turkish scientists, engineers, and institutions, highlighting the importance of national resources in achieving this milestone.
Table 1: Technical Specifications of Turksat 6A
Specification
Details
Satellite Type
Communication
Launch Vehicle
SpaceX Falcon 9
Launch Site
Cape Canaveral, Florida
Domestic Production
Over 81%
Coverage Area
5 billion people
Signal Reception
67 minutes post-launch
Importance of Turksat 6A
The successful launch of Turksat 6A has significant implications for Turkey’s communication and broadcasting sectors. With an expanded coverage area reaching up to 5 billion people, the satellite enhances the nation’s ability to provide secure and efficient communication services. This development is particularly crucial for television broadcasting, ensuring better and safer transmission of content.
Table 2: Impact of Turksat 6A on Communication and Broadcasting
Impact
Description
Expanded Coverage
Reaches 5 billion people globally
Enhanced Communication
Improved security and efficiency
Television Broadcasting
Better and safer transmission of content
New Regional Reach
India, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand included
Global Significance
By launching Turksat 6A, Turkey has positioned itself among an elite group of nations capable of producing their own communication satellites. This accomplishment not only boosts Turkey’s technological reputation but also opens up new opportunities for international collaboration and partnerships in space exploration.
“As Turkey, we produced more than 81% of the subsystems, satellite ground stations, and software in the 6A project, which is of great importance for our country’s future in space, with national resources.”
The successful launch of Turksat 6A sets the stage for future advancements in Turkey’s space program. With this milestone achieved, Turkey is poised to continue its investment in space technology, aiming to develop more advanced satellites and explore new frontiers in space exploration. This trajectory aligns with Turkey’s broader vision of becoming a key player in the global space industry.
Conclusion
Turkey’s entry into the space race with the launch of Turksat 6A is a historic achievement that underscores the nation’s growing technological capabilities and ambition. By successfully developing and launching its first domestically-produced communication satellite, Turkey has demonstrated its commitment to self-reliance, innovation, and strategic advancement in space technology. This milestone marks the beginning of a new era for Turkey’s space program, paving the way for future successes and international collaborations.
Artemis Program: Why a Moon Base Will Need a Transport System
Key Takeaway
The Artemis Program aims to establish a permanent human presence on the Moon, necessitating advanced transport systems to move astronauts and cargo efficiently. Addressing logistical, scientific, and technical requirements, these transport systems will play a crucial role in ensuring the success of lunar missions and the sustainability of human activities on the Moon.
Summary
NASA’s Artemis Program will return astronauts to the Moon for the first time since 1972.
Transport systems are essential for moving astronauts and cargo on the lunar surface.
The 2024 Moon to Mars Architecture white paper highlights the need for lunar mobility systems.
NASA’s objectives include the delivery of crews, supplies, experiments, and habitats.
The Lunar Terrain Vehicle (LTV) and Pressurized Rover (PR) are part of the Artemis Base Camp.
The Artemis Program is divided into three segments: Human Lunar Return (HLR), Foundational Exploration (FE), and Sustained Lunar Evolution (SLR).
The program’s initial missions will require enhanced transport capabilities for crew and cargo.
The lunar surface presents unique challenges, including regolith, lighting conditions, and terrain.
Autonomous and teleoperated systems will be vital for mobility on the Moon.
Energy and environmental considerations are crucial for the design of lunar transport systems.
Future mobility systems will need to be interoperable and capable of autonomous operation.
NASA will address these requirements in the 2024 Architecture Concept Review (2024 ACR).
Artemis Program: Why a Moon Base Will Need a Transport System
NASA’s Artemis Program will send astronauts back to the Moon. The last visit was Apollo 17 in 1972. The next mission is planned for September 2026. NASA will then build the systems needed for yearly trips to the Moon. This will lead to humans living there permanently. There will be a big need for cargo delivery systems. These systems must help with the needs of the crews. They must support their exploration with the right logistical, scientific, and technical support.
We need transportation systems not just for delivering crews and cargo. They must also handle logistical needs and help exploration efforts. These needs were described in a 2024 Moon to Mars Architecture white paper. The paper is titled “Lunar Mobility Drivers and Needs.”
It follows another paper called “Lunar Surface Cargo.” This new white paper talks about the need for lunar infrastructure. Such infrastructure will help move astronauts and payloads from landing sites to important locations. As usual, they found a big gap between what we can currently do and what we expect to need.
The authors again stress the need for mobility systems. These systems should align with NASA’s goals. These goals are outlined in the Moon to Mars Architecture Definition Document (ADD). The authors say recent studies show something important. We need transport systems on the lunar surface. These systems should move cargo from delivery points to usage points. This cargo can include crew supplies, scientific demonstrations, and large infrastructure that needs precise moving.
In short, in addition to landers capable of delivering crews, supplies, experiments, and habitats, NASA’s Moon to Mars program also requires vehicles and support networks that can deliver them from point A to point B. As they state, the currently defined mobility elements are either primarily for crew use or are limited in mobility. This includes elements like the Lunar Terrain Vehicle (LTV) and the Pressurized Rover (PR) – which are elements of the Artemis Base Camp – and robotic missions contracted through the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program.
In addition, the needs and challenges that will emerge as the Artemis Program unfolds are broken down into three segments: Human Lunar Return (HLR), Foundational Exploration (FE), and Sustained Lunar Evolution (SLR). The HLR segment includes the Artemis III mission, currently scheduled for September 2026, where a crew of two will land on the lunar surface using a Starship HLS. The FE segment will coincide with Artemis IV and Artemis V (2028 and 2030), where crew sizes will expand from two to four, and the necessary infrastructure will expand.
After that, during the SLR segment, NASA plans to mount a mission a year and establish a permanent lunar habitat. Throughout this period, the demands for payloads and transportation systems will exceed current capabilities, limited to 15,000 kg (33,070 lbs) of cargo. Similar to what NASA related in their Lunar Surface Cargo whitepaper, accomplishing key mission objectives will require cargo of sizes and masses beyond these capabilities, creating the need for additional solutions.
Mobility demand forecast shows how much transportation will be needed in the future. LTV stands for Lunar Terrain Vehicle. LRV stands for Lunar Roving Vehicle. These are types of transport vehicles used on the moon. NASA compared how well LTV and LRV could meet the future transportation needs.
Isolation and Movement
As the authors state, a major issue on the lunar surface affecting mobility is the need for separation between landing sites and points of use. This separation is motivated by several factors, including science objectives, lighting conditions, and safety considerations. In short, crew vehicles, habitats, and key infrastructure will be positioned at a distance from landing sites so as not to be affected by darkness caused by the landers’ shadow, contamination by the landers, and regolith or blast ejecta created by engine plumes. Based on the level of concern, separation distances are broken down into three tiers:
Separation from lander shadowing: tens of meters (tens of yards)
Lander blast ejecta constraints: due either to separation between the lander and existing infrastructure or lander ascent (>1,000 m; ~1090 yards)
Support for aggregation of elements in ideal habitation zones from available regional landing areas: up to 5,000 m (~5470 yards)
NASA’s Moon to Mars mission architecture emphasizes the need for In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU), such as water ice, regolith, and minerals. NASA also recognizes the need to select habitation and hibernation sites that minimize the exposure to darkness from shadows caused by the local topography and the inclination of the Sun during lunar nights (which last two weeks at a time). This is easiest at higher elevations and on top of crater ridges. This necessitates two things:
Exploration, habitation, and power sites will need to be located far from landing and ISRU sites.
Traverses from landing to habitation zones could encounter slopes of up to 20 degrees.
As the authors state, these overlapping challenges can be met by ensuring systems are in place so mission elements can move away from landers once they are deployed on the surface:
“This could be done using independent or integrated mobility systems. The frequency of traverses between downslope and upslope locations would be driven by the cadence with which landers deliver cargo to the lunar surface and the mass that a given mobility system can carry on each traversal. Integrated architecture operations will necessitate non-trivial relocation and aggregation ranges for cargo and assets.”
Transportation Abilities
During the FE segment of the Artemis Program, NASA plans to expand surface crews from two to four, which will need to operate on the surface for about 30 days. This will require a wide range of mobility needs that can accommodate payloads of varying size and mass and over a range of distances. These include:
Smaller technology demonstrations: 500 to 2000 kg (~1100 to 4410 lbs)
Logistic Elements per crewed surface mission: 2,000 to 6,000 kg (~4410 to 13,230 lbs)
Habitation Systems: 12,000 to 15,000 kg (~26455 to 33,070 lbs)
The authors acknowledge that current mobility elements could provide some cargo relocation capabilities – the LTV, for example, can accommodate 800 kg (~1764 lbs) of cargo when uncrewed. However, according to the NASA team’s analysis, the mobility capacity falls short of demand by 1,000 to 15,000 kg (2,200 to 33,070 lbs) per asset for ranges of 50 to 5,000 m (~55 to 5470 yards). Moreover, the “frequency of relocation needs” (i.e., how often payloads need to be moved) will vary considerably, ranging from single operations for large elements to multiple trips a year for containers and smaller cargo.
Environments
The authors also address how lunar conditions are important when developing mobility systems. One of the greatest hazards on the Moon is regolith (aka. “moondust”), the fine silicate powder that covers much of the surface and sticks to everything it comes into contact with. There are lighting conditions where parts of the South Pole region will be shadowed due to the inclination of the Sun and permanently shadowed regions (PSRs) that experience perpetual darkness. Last is the matter of the terrain, which can be rocky or covered by 1 to 10 m (3.3 to 33 ft) of regolith and where slopes of more than 10 degrees are common.
This combination of factors, they argue, “creates a significant technological gap between existing systems and mobility demands for future exploration.” For starters, energy systems must provide enough power so vehicles can maintain sufficient speeds and carrying capacity and can operate during lunar nights. The authors also recommend conducting more studies on regolith mitigation strategies to prevent wear and tear and the effects regolith could have on electro-mechanical systems. They also stress the need for sufficient autonomy and/or teleoperation, allowing greater flexibility and range.
These autonomous systems must contend with the challenging lunar terrain, map the local topography, recognize obstacles and unpassable regions, and identify optimal pathways to reach their destinations. As the authors note, these systems could offer increased flexibility for mission planning and increase the speed of mobile assets, especially in areas where the terrain interferes with communications and makes remote operations impossible.
Artemis Program Why a Moon Base Will Need a Transport System
Energy and Environmental Demands
The white paper also addresses energy and environmental considerations. As noted already, lunar nights are two weeks long, which poses significant challenges for exploration and habitation. Currently, NASA’s Moon to Mars architecture does not specify how the base camps will be powered, though solar power is considered a safe bet. However, the team notes that generating sufficient power to accommodate lunar operations will require solar power systems with “surface mobility capabilities.”
They also note that lunar mobility systems will need to operate for 12 hours a day for up to 30 days and that proposed systems will need to deliver sufficient power to operate for six to twelve months. The thermal environments are also a serious consideration, with average daytime temperatures reaching 120 °C (248 °F) and nighttime temperatures going down to -170 °C (-274 °F). This creates issues for systems that are required to operate day and night.
Conclusion
NASA sees the need for flexible mobility systems. These systems will help astronauts and cargo move across the lunar surface. The systems must meet the needs of the Artemis Program. HLR, FE, and SLR segments define these needs. Current systems handle some mobility needs, but there is a gap. Future missions will need more advanced capabilities. The 2024 Architecture Concept Review (2024 ACR) will focus on these needs.
NASA aims to develop new mobile assets. These assets must work together smoothly and operate on their own without constant human control. The Artemis Program will rely on these assets for its first lunar missions in 2026. This includes delivering infrastructure and crew missions in the late 2020s. By the 2030s, NASA wants to have a lasting presence on the Moon. Closing these technology gaps will help astronauts explore and do science on the Moon.
Tables
Mission Segment
Crew Size
Duration
Infrastructure Needs
Human Lunar Return (HLR)
2
1-2 weeks
Initial landing and exploration infrastructure
Foundational Exploration (FE)
4
30 days
Expanded habitats, power systems, mobility solutions
This website utilizes first- and third-party tools that store small files (cookies) on your device. These cookies serve various purposes, including ensuring the site functions correctly (technical cookies), analyzing site usage (analytics cookies), and delivering relevant advertisements (profiling cookies). While technical cookies are essential and used by default, you have the option to enable or disable analytics and profiling cookies. By allowing these cookies, you help us enhance your browsing experience.
