Tag

#Astronauts

Browsing

NASA Countdown Begins: Most Powerful Human Spaceflight Ever

NASA is gearing up for the most powerful human spaceflight ever with the Artemis II mission, utilizing the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket. This mission marks a significant milestone in space exploration, setting the stage for future lunar missions and ultimately, Mars exploration.

Summary

  • The Space Launch System (SLS) rocket is being prepared for the Artemis II mission, scheduled for no earlier than September 2025.
  • The SLS rocket’s core stage, equipped with four RS-25 engines, was moved to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) on July 24.
  • The RS-25 engines, converted from the Space Shuttle Program, include engines with previous spaceflight experience.
  • The SLS rocket, with its core stage and solid rocket boosters, provides 8.8 million pounds of thrust at liftoff.
  • NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, and Christina Koch, along with Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen, will fly in the Orion capsule for a 10-day mission around the moon.
  • Artemis II aims to validate the life-support systems of the Orion capsule in preparation for Artemis III, which plans to return humans to the lunar surface in 2026.
  • The mission will mark significant milestones: Glover as the first Black man, Koch as the first woman, and Hansen as the first Canadian to travel beyond low-Earth orbit.
  • Delays in the Artemis program are primarily due to issues with the Orion capsule’s heat shield and other technical challenges.
  • The Artemis program is a major part of NASA’s budget, with the Artemis III mission projected to cost $93 billion since 2012.
  • Future SLS launches face cost challenges, but competition from SpaceX and Blue Origin may offer more affordable options.
  • NASA aims to land humans on Mars by 2040 as part of the long-term Artemis program goals.
NASA Countdown Begins Most Powerful Human Spaceflight Ever
An illustration of a nice deep space planet background

Main Article

The launch clock isn’t set yet, but the hardware is lined up for what would become the most powerful rocket to ever send humans into space during a moonbound trip the likes of which has not happened in more than 50 years. The biggest piece of the Space Launch System rocket, the 212-foot-long core stage, crept its way into the massive Vehicle Assembly Building on July 24, where work will begin to prepare it for the Artemis II launch set for no earlier than September 2025.

“The clock’s already started,” said John Honeycutt, NASA SLS program manager. “We’ve got a great deal of work to do to get the rocket ready to go fly.”

The core stage sports four RS-25 engines converted by Melbourne-based L3Harris’ Aerojet Rocketdyne from the retired stock of the Space Shuttle Program. Two of the engines have previously flown on a combined 20 shuttle missions, while the other pair are making their debuts. Engine 2047 flew on STS-135, the final launch of the program on Space Shuttle Atlantis in 2011.

Also no stranger to KSC are the casings from the two solid rocket boosters fabricated by Northrop Grumman. They had previously supported space shuttle missions but were regularly fished out of the ocean for refurbishment. Those two boosters sit broken down into five segments each just north of the VAB at the Rotation, Processing, and Surge Facility.

Combined, the core stage and the boosters provide 8.8 million pounds of thrust on liftoff. Their next launch will make the SLS the most powerful rocket to ever send humans into space. NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, and Christina Koch with Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen will ride in the Lockheed Martin-built Orion capsule for what’s planned to be a 10-day trip around the moon.

Doug Hurley, a former NASA astronaut and now an executive with Northrop Grumman who flew on both shuttle missions and the first human spaceflight of SpaceX Crew Dragon, has tried to give the astronauts an idea of what their ride might be like.

“The ride on the booster for 126 seconds, I just said it’s gonna be the most incredible ride of your life. Because really, the acceleration is eye-watering,” Hurley said.

The shuttle rides used boosters made up of four segments versus the five that are stacked for SLS, and with Orion on top of the core stage, it will be more like the Apollo astronauts’ rides on the Saturn V rocket.

“Being on the top of the stack and feeling the steering … can’t wait to hear the story,” he said.

Their goal is to ensure the Orion capsule’s life-support systems work, setting up the Artemis III mission no earlier than September 2026. That mission aims to return humans, including the first woman, to the lunar surface for the first time since the Apollo 17 mission in 1972.

The Artemis II quartet, though, will still travel more than 230,000 miles from Earth, and while not landing on the moon, flying beyond low-Earth orbit is a feat that also has not been accomplished by humans since the final Apollo flight. Glover will become the first Black man to make the trip, Koch the first woman, and Hansen the first Canadian. All 24 of the astronauts who made the trip during nine Apollo missions to the moon between 1968 and 1972 were white American men. Six of those missions sent 12 of those men to the lunar surface.

Delays and Uncertainty

The 2025 launch date for Artemis’ first human spaceflight is nearly a year behind the schedule laid out after the successful launch of Artemis I in November 2022. A roughly two-year gap between the uncrewed debut and the first crewed mission was thought to be enough time to pore over the Artemis I data and work through any issues. But a series of major bumps in the road became evident and one of them has yet to have a final solution revealed by NASA.

That’s the fact that the protective coating on Orion’s heat shield lost a lot more material, some in fist-sized chunks, than what was expected. The ultimate solution for the Orion capsule will be the major domino holding up the process of stacking the SLS to get ready for launch. Managers won’t begin putting it together vertically until they know there will be a spacecraft coming to top it off, but even though this is the second time around, NASA managers expect to face some hurdles.

“There’s always something that happens, you know, something spills on something, some test didn’t work as planned,” said Chris Cianciola, the SLS deputy program manager. “So you triage it all the way. You don’t want to wait ’til you get out to the launch pad to find out you got a problem.”

For now, a completed Orion capsule is expected to be delivered to the VAB by Oct. 31. If NASA signals no delay, then the first placement of the solid rocket boosters in the VAB could begin in September. NASA has built in a one-year lifespan limiter for the solid rocket boosters, a clock that starts ticking the moment the second segment is placed atop the first. That’s expected to happen in the late fall, which would keep Artemis II on its launch target timeline.

Another limiting factor in stacking is getting back to the VAB the mobile launcher on which SLS and Orion will sit. Currently parked at KSC’s Launch Pad 39-B, it has had to go through a series of repairs after the Artemis I launch tore parts of it to shreds.

“These are the largest solid rocket motors on the planet, and when that vehicle lifts off from the mobile launcher, that plume has to go someplace,” said Shawn Quinn, program manager for Exploration Ground Systems (EGS) based at KSC. “As the vehicle gets higher up, that plume spreads out, and it’s a very, very strong force. … Forget about the heat for a moment, but if the person was standing there, they’d be blown out to kingdom come.”

EGS crews also have had to install emergency exit apparatus such as the zipline cages and crew access arm changes so the humans on board can have a chance to survive if something goes wrong on the pad. Quinn said that work is “nearly done” and the mobile launcher should be back at the VAB in time for stacking.

Cost and Criticism

The Artemis program now controls the majority of NASA’s annual budget this year, surpassing the overall science mission budget for the first time as the agency’s top-funded segment. The enacted fiscal 2024 budget comes out to more than $7.6 billion of NASA’s overall $24.875 billion budget. Because the Artemis program involves so many commercial partners, it has a lot of support across Congress, which ultimately approves the budget. So while the science budget request was cut by more than $500 million from the Biden administration request this fiscal year, the Artemis campaign programs were nearly fully funded.

NASA’s Office of the Inspector General has continued to audit the growing costs of the Artemis program, with a 2023 report stating that the Artemis III missions will cost the country $93 billion since its inception in 2012. That’s billions more than envisioned with delays and cost increases plaguing the leadup to Artemis I. The SLS rocket represents 26% of that cost to the tune of $23.8 billion, with a giant chunk spent on the first and second launch hardware.

The audit forecasts future SLS launches to cost more than $2.5 billion each, although NASA has laid out a plan to reduce those costs by half, something the OIG deemed “highly unrealistic” and a threat to its deep-space exploration plans. The audit, though, notes that while SLS is the only viable option now for NASA, competition from SpaceX Starship and Blue Origin’s New Glenn rockets may help level the playing field for NASA’s plans.

“Although the SLS is the only launch vehicle capable of transporting both crew and cargo to the moon in a single mission, its high cost threatens the affordability and sustainability of NASA’s Artemis missions,” the audit stated. “The Agency has taken steps to lower production costs by requiring future SLS rockets to be produced with new, non-refurbished RS-25 engines and solid rocket booster segments. NASA also seeks to reduce per-mission costs to $1.5 billion or less, a goal we find highly unrealistic based on current costs.”

In its response, NASA said it would be up to private companies such as SpaceX and Blue Origin to take up the challenge to provide the vehicles for the next missions to deep space with a target of 2040 for humans to land on Mars. Even for now, a version of Starship is slated to provide the human lunar lander for the Artemis III mission.

But for now, the focus is on getting SLS ready for humans to make the trip around the moon and back. Honeycutt said that while there were still a lot of milestones to hit before launch, he expects to be able to meet them.

“We got to stay focused,” he said. “We don’t have the budget to start over. We got to press forward with what we got and make it work.”

Tables

Table 1: Artemis II Mission Details

Aspect Description
Launch Date No earlier than September 2025
Duration 10 days
Astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch, Jeremy Hansen
Distance More than 230,000 miles from Earth
Objective Validate Orion’s life-support systems
Next Mission Artemis III (Return humans to the lunar surface)

Table 2: Space Launch System (SLS) Rocket Specifications

Component Specification
Core Stage 212 feet long, 4 RS-25 engines
Solid Rocket Boosters 5 segments each, refurbished from Shuttle Program
Thrust 8.8 million pounds at liftoff
Payload Capacity 95 metric tons to low Earth orbit
Cost Per Launch Over $2.5 billion

Conclusion

The countdown to NASA’s most powerful human spaceflight ever is well underway. With the Artemis II mission, the Space Launch System rocket is set to achieve a historic milestone in space exploration. As NASA prepares to send astronauts around the moon, the success of this mission will pave the way for future lunar landings and the eventual goal of human exploration on Mars. Despite the challenges and costs, the Artemis program represents a bold step forward in humanity’s quest to explore the cosmos.

Hashtags

#NASA, #SpaceLaunchSystem, #ArtemisII, #SpaceExploration, #MoonMission, #HumanSpaceflight, #OrionCapsule, #Astronauts, #SpaceProgram, #FutureMissions

How Time Differs on the Moon: 57 Microseconds Per Earth Day Insight

Key Takeaways

Time on the moon ticks 57 microseconds faster per day than on Earth. This difference could impact navigation and coordination in lunar missions. NASA is tasked with defining a lunar time zone as lunar exploration increases. The disparity in time is due to differences in gravity and the moon’s velocity relative to Earth. Accurate timekeeping is essential for future manned and unmanned lunar missions.

Summary

  • Time on the moon is faster: 57 microseconds faster per Earth day.
  • Lunar missions increasing: NASA plans to return humans to the moon; multiple uncrewed missions already underway.
  • Need for accurate timekeeping: Crucial for navigation, coordination, and scientific experiments.
  • Why time differs: Result of gravitational time dilation and the moon’s relative velocity.
  • NASA’s role: Developing a lunar time zone to standardize timekeeping.
  • Impact on astronauts: Synchronization with Earth time essential for mission success.
  • Scientific importance: Understanding time differences helps in various scientific and technological aspects.
  • Technological challenges: Developing clocks and synchronization methods for lunar use.
  • Future prospects: Improved timekeeping methods could aid in deep space exploration.
  • Collaboration: International efforts required for a unified lunar time system.

Introduction

What time is it on the moon? This question might seem trivial at first glance, but with lunar exploration set to ramp up in the coming decade, defining a lunar time zone has become a critical task. Astronauts and mission controllers must consider that time on the moon ticks ever so slightly faster than it does on Earth—by approximately 57 microseconds per Earth day.

NASA’s Artemis program aims to return humans to the moon for the first time in more than 50 years. Alongside this ambitious plan, multiple uncrewed missions have already made their way to the lunar surface, signaling a new era of lunar exploration. However, the subtle differences in timekeeping between Earth and the moon present a unique challenge that must be addressed to ensure the success of these missions.

Why Time Differs on the Moon

Gravitational Time Dilation

One of the primary reasons for the time difference between the Earth and the moon is gravitational time dilation. According to Einstein’s theory of relativity, time passes at different rates in regions of different gravitational potential. The moon has a weaker gravitational field compared to Earth, meaning that time on the lunar surface passes slightly faster.

Relative Velocity

Another factor contributing to the time difference is the relative velocity of the moon. The moon orbits Earth at an average distance of about 384,400 kilometers (238,855 miles), moving at a speed of roughly 1.022 kilometers per second (0.635 miles per second). This motion causes time on the moon to tick faster compared to a stationary observer on Earth.

Importance of Accurate Timekeeping

Navigation and Coordination

Accurate timekeeping is crucial for the navigation and coordination of lunar missions. With multiple spacecraft operating simultaneously, precise timing ensures that each mission proceeds smoothly without conflicts. Navigation systems rely on synchronized clocks to determine the position and velocity of spacecraft accurately.

Scientific Experiments

Timekeeping also plays a vital role in scientific experiments conducted on the lunar surface. Experiments that measure seismic activity, temperature changes, and other phenomena require precise timing to yield accurate results. Any discrepancies in timekeeping could lead to erroneous data and potentially compromise scientific findings.

Communication with Earth

Maintaining synchronization between lunar and Earth time is essential for effective communication. Mission controllers on Earth need to coordinate with astronauts on the moon, and any time lag could lead to delays or misunderstandings. Standardizing timekeeping practices between Earth and the moon ensures seamless communication and operational efficiency.

NASA’s Role in Defining Lunar Time

Developing a Lunar Time Zone

NASA has been tasked with developing a lunar time zone to standardize timekeeping on the moon. This involves creating a system that accounts for the 57-microsecond daily difference while remaining synchronized with Earth time. The lunar time zone will serve as a reference for all future missions, ensuring consistency and reliability.

Synchronizing Lunar Clocks

One of the challenges in establishing a lunar time zone is developing clocks that can remain synchronized with Earth-based timekeeping systems. These clocks must account for the differences in gravitational potential and relative velocity to maintain accurate time. Advances in atomic clock technology and synchronization methods will be essential for this task.

Impact on Astronauts and Missions

Daily Operations

Astronauts on the moon will need to adjust to the slight difference in timekeeping. While 57 microseconds per day may seem negligible, over the course of a mission, these discrepancies can add up. Ensuring that astronauts’ schedules are synchronized with mission control on Earth is vital for the smooth operation of daily activities.

Mission Planning

Mission planners must consider the time difference when designing schedules and timelines for lunar missions. This includes coordinating launch windows, communication schedules, and scientific experiments. Accurate timekeeping helps in optimizing mission planning and reducing the risk of errors or delays.

How Time Differs on the Moon: 57 Microseconds Per Earth Day Insight
A computer generated close-up of the planet Mars with shine. 3d rendering of realistic cosmic background. Elements of this image are presented by NASA

Scientific and Technological Significance

Deep Space Exploration

Understanding and addressing time differences on the moon sets a precedent for future deep space exploration. As missions venture farther from Earth, the effects of gravitational time dilation and relative velocity will become more pronounced. Developing robust timekeeping systems for the moon provides a foundation for tackling these challenges in deep space.

Technological Innovations

The need for precise timekeeping on the moon drives technological innovations in clock design and synchronization methods. Advances in atomic clock technology, time transfer techniques, and synchronization protocols have broader applications beyond lunar missions. These innovations can benefit various fields, including telecommunications, global positioning systems (GPS), and scientific research.

Collaboration and International Efforts

Unified Lunar Time System

Establishing a unified lunar time system requires international collaboration. Space agencies from around the world must work together to develop and implement standardized timekeeping practices for lunar missions. This collaboration ensures that all lunar activities are synchronized, regardless of the mission’s origin.

Sharing Knowledge and Resources

International cooperation also involves sharing knowledge and resources to address the challenges of lunar timekeeping. By pooling expertise and technological capabilities, space agencies can develop more effective solutions and accelerate progress in lunar exploration.

Future Prospects

Lunar Bases and Colonies

As plans for establishing lunar bases and colonies progress, accurate timekeeping will become even more critical. A standardized lunar time zone will facilitate daily operations, scientific research, and communication for long-term habitation on the moon. Reliable timekeeping systems will support the infrastructure needed for sustainable lunar presence.

Enhanced Exploration Capabilities

Improved timekeeping methods will enhance exploration capabilities on the moon and beyond. Accurate navigation, communication, and scientific experiments will enable more ambitious missions and deeper exploration of the lunar surface and other celestial bodies. These advancements pave the way for the continued expansion of human presence in space.

View of the red terrestrial planet. space concept
View of the red terrestrial planet. space concept

Tables

Table 1: Comparison of Time on Earth and the Moon

Aspect Earth Moon
Gravitational Potential Stronger Weaker
Relative Velocity Stationary (relative) 1.022 km/s
Time Difference Standard 57 microseconds faster per day
Impact on Timekeeping None Requires adjustment

Table 2: Key Challenges in Lunar Timekeeping

Challenge Description
Gravitational Time Dilation Accounting for weaker gravitational field on the moon
Relative Velocity Compensating for the moon’s orbital motion
Synchronization Ensuring lunar clocks remain in sync with Earth-based timekeeping systems
Technological Development Advancing atomic clock and synchronization technologies
International Collaboration Establishing a unified lunar time system through global cooperation

Conclusion

As humanity begins a new age of lunar exploration, we must understand and handle the small differences in timekeeping between Earth and the moon. There is a small daily time difference of 57 microseconds. This may seem minor, but it is very important. It affects navigation, coordination, and scientific research on the moon’s surface.

NASA is working hard to create a lunar time zone and ways to keep time synchronized. “Synchronization” means making sure things happen at the same time. This is very important for future moon missions. Accurate clocks will help with daily tasks, planning missions, and communicating. This keeps astronauts safe and helps them explore the moon efficiently.

Countries and new technologies will be very important to solve the problems of keeping time on the moon. Space agencies need to work together. They can create a single time system for the moon. This shared system will help all missions and prepare us for exploring further into space.

Advances in lunar timekeeping help us do more than just work on the moon. They also prepare us to explore other planets and moons. As we go further into space, having precise time will be key. Accurate timekeeping helps us explore and understand the universe better.

Hashtags

#TimeOnTheMoon, #LunarExploration, #NASAMissions, #LunarTimeZone, #SpaceScience, #GravitationalTimeDilation, #Timekeeping, #Astronauts, #LunarMissions, #SpaceExploration

NASA Delays Boeing’s Starliner Launch Landing to June 22

Key Takeaway:

Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft, carrying NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, will now return to Earth on June 22. The delay allows for additional testing and system checks on the International Space Station, providing critical data for future missions.

Summary:

  • Boeing’s Starliner launched on June 5 with astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams.
  • The spacecraft docked at the ISS on June 6.
  • The mission was originally planned for about a week but is now extended.
  • The new return date is set for June 22.
  • Additional tests and safety drills will be conducted.
  • Initial delay was due to ISS preparation for an EVA.
  • Further delay reasons will be discussed in a NASA briefing.
  • Key personnel: Steve Stich and Mark Nappi.

 

Detailed Article

On June 5, 2024, NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams launched aboard Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft as part of the Crew Flight Test (CFT) mission. The mission, intended to validate the Spacecraft’s performance during a full on-orbit shakedown, saw the Starliner dock with the International Space Station (ISS) the following day. Originally set for a week-long duration, the mission will now extend until June 22, allowing for additional tests and data collection.

The Launch and Docking

The Crew Flight Test for Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft marks a significant milestone in NASA’s Commercial Crew Program. Launching on June 5 from Cape Canaveral, the spacecraft carried two seasoned NASA astronauts: Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams. The mission aimed to demonstrate Starliner’s capabilities and ensure its readiness for future long-term missions.

Upon docking with the ISS on June 6, the Starliner successfully integrated with the station, providing a robust platform for the astronauts to conduct tests and assessments. This docking not only validated the spacecraft’s automated rendezvous and docking systems but also set the stage for an extended stay and additional evaluations.

Delays and Their Implications

First Delay: Extravehicular Activity Preparation

Initially, the mission was scheduled to last about a week. However, on June 9, a delay was announced, pushing the return date to June 18. The primary reason for this delay was to allow ISS residents more time to prepare for an extravehicular activity (EVA) planned for June 13. Unfortunately, this EVA was canceled due to “spacesuit discomfort,” identified shortly before NASA astronauts Tracy Dyson and Matt Dominick were set to exit the station.

Second Delay: Extended Testing

The most recent delay, announced on June 17, extends the mission by an additional four days, moving the return date to June 22. While NASA did not immediately provide a direct reason for this delay, it is believed to offer a unique opportunity for additional testing and validation of Starliner’s systems.

Steve Stich, manager of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, emphasized the importance of these extended tests:

“We are continuing to understand the capabilities of Starliner to prepare for the long-term goal of having it perform a six-month docked mission at the space station.”

NASA Delays Boeing's Starliner Launch Landing to June 22

Additional Tests and Safety Drills

With the extended stay, Wilmore and Williams will conduct several critical tests and drills. These include a “hot-fire” test of seven of the spacecraft’s eight aft thrusters and a review of hatch operations. Furthermore, they will perform “safe haven” drills to prepare the capsule for potential emergencies, enhancing their readiness for unforeseen situations.

Mark Nappi, vice president and program manager for Boeing’s Commercial Crew Program, expressed optimism about the extended mission:

“We have an incredible opportunity to spend more time at station and perform more tests which provides invaluable data unique to our position.”

Table 1: Key Events in the Starliner Mission

Date Event Details
June 5, 2024 Launch of Starliner Launched with astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams
June 6, 2024 Docking with ISS Successful docking with the ISS
June 9, 2024 First delay announced Extended mission to June 18 due to EVA preparation
June 13, 2024 Planned EVA EVA canceled due to spacesuit discomfort
June 17, 2024 Second delay announced New return date set for June 22

Impact on Future Missions

Preparing for Long-Term Missions

The data gathered during this extended mission will be crucial for future operations. The tests and drills conducted will provide valuable insights into the Starliner’s performance in various scenarios, ensuring its readiness for longer, more complex missions.

Enhancing Safety Protocols

The “safe haven” drills and thruster tests are particularly significant as they enhance the safety protocols for future crews. These exercises help astronauts prepare for emergencies, ensuring they can respond effectively and safely.

Table 2: Starliner System Tests

Test Purpose Outcome Expected
Hot-fire test of thrusters Validate thruster performance under load Ensure reliable propulsion in critical maneuvers
Hatch operations review Assess hatch functionality and ease of use Confirm reliability for docking and undocking
Safe haven drills Prepare for emergency scenarios Enhance crew readiness for unforeseen situations

Future Prospects and Challenges

Collaboration with NASA and Boeing

The collaboration between NASA and Boeing is pivotal for the success of the Commercial Crew Program. Both organizations are committed to ensuring the Starliner meets all safety and performance standards. The additional time spent in orbit provides a valuable opportunity to refine the spacecraft’s systems and protocols.

Addressing Technical Issues

While the mission has faced delays, these are not uncommon in space exploration. Addressing technical issues and ensuring the safety of the crew are of paramount importance. The delays allow both NASA and Boeing to meticulously examine the spacecraft and make necessary adjustments.

Conclusion

The delay in Boeing’s Starliner mission to June 22 highlights the complexities and challenges of space exploration. While the delays may seem inconvenient, they provide essential opportunities to gather data, conduct tests, and enhance safety protocols. The collaboration between NASA and Boeing continues to push the boundaries of what is possible in human spaceflight, paving the way for future long-term missions to the International Space Station and beyond.

Hashtags

#NASA, #Boeing, #Starliner,, #SpaceExploration #ISS, #Astronauts, #SpaceMission, #CommercialCrew, #SpaceSafety, #ScienceAndTechnology
Pin It
error: Content is protected !!

On this website we use first or third-party tools that store small files (<i>cookie</i>) on your device. Cookies are normally used to allow the site to run properly (<i>technical cookies</i>), to generate navigation usage reports (<i>statistics cookies</i>) and to suitable advertise our services/products (<i>profiling cookies</i>). We can directly use technical cookies, but <u>you have the right to choose whether or not to enable statistical and profiling cookies</u>. <b>Enabling these cookies, you help us to offer you a better experience</b>.